SKY RIVER LLC

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
77 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Kern County
Operator
SKY RIVER LLC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2021
EIA plant ID
50536
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
245 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
46%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
35.2608, -118.2469

See it on the map

SKY RIVER LLC, a 77 MW Wind power plant in Kern County, California. Operated by SKY RIVER LLC, commissioned 2021.

How SKY RIVER LLC compares

With 77 MW of capacity, SKY RIVER LLC ranks 194th among the 874 operating power plants Bywatts maps in California and 31st of the 89 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 1.4% of California's operating Wind capacity and 0.1% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 322nd-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2021, it is newer than 99% of the 859 operating California plants with a recorded commissioning year. It shares Kern County with 118 other operating plants, including LA PALOMA GENERATING LLC and PASTORIA ENERGY FACILITY LLC.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 60 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology (this page's HIFLD capacity figure is 77 MW). Net generation was 245 GWh in 2024 (a 46% capacity factor), up 33% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The nearest named substation is PINETREE (230 kV), about 4.1 miles away; the closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 230 kV line owned by AZUSA LIGHT & POWER, about 3.6 miles away. Another 51 operating power plants totaling 3,206 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is PINYON PINE I (168 MW, Wind).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant, substation and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

SKY RIVER LLC is a 77 MW wind power plant in Kern County, CA, operated by SKY RIVER LLC, commissioned in 2021. Kern County carries low modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 1.7 of 5 at the 18th national percentile. Wildfire is the leading peril, rated Relatively High by FEMA at the 98th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

1.7 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
LowExposure band
WildfireLeading peril
Relatively HighFEMA county risk rating

Kern County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
WildfireRelatively High98th4.9 of 5<0.01
EarthquakeRelatively High97th4.9 of 50.08
Heat waveRelatively High79th4.2 of 57.5
Riverine floodingRelatively High55th3.2 of 55.6
Strong windRelatively Low3rd1.1 of 50.06
TornadoVery Low3rd1.1 of 50.37
Winter weatherRelatively Moderate3rd1.1 of 55.4
LightningRelatively High2nd1.1 of 58.0
HailRelatively Low0th1.0 of 50.10

Perils not assessed in Kern County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Ice stormFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Kern County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.