CANE ISLAND

Operating

Natural Gas power plant

Capacity
736 MW
Primary fuel
Natural Gas
County
Osceola County
Operator
KISSIMMEE UTILITY AUTHORITY
Status
Operating
Commissioned
1994
EIA plant ID
7238
Generators
7
Technology
Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle
Net generation (2024)
4,095 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
66%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
28.2763, -81.5329

See it on the map

CANE ISLAND, a 736 MW Natural Gas power plant in Osceola County, Florida. Operated by KISSIMMEE UTILITY AUTHORITY, commissioned 1994.

How CANE ISLAND compares

With 736 MW of capacity, CANE ISLAND ranks 28th among the 110 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Florida and 18th of the 55 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 1.6% of Florida's operating Natural Gas capacity and 1.2% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 171st-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 1994, it is newer than 52% of the 108 operating Florida plants with a recorded commissioning year. It shares Osceola County with 2 other operating plants, INTERCESSION CITY and OSCEOLA.

EIA-860 lists 7 generators at the site with 706 MW of nameplate capacity, mainly natural gas fired combined cycle technology. Net generation was 4,095 GWh in 2024 (a 66% capacity factor), up 12% from 2022. Its generators came online between 1994 and 2011.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 230 kV line owned by DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC, under 0.1 miles away. Another 4 operating power plants totaling 2,085 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is INTERCESSION CITY (1,310 MW, Natural Gas).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

CANE ISLAND is a 736 MW natural gas power plant in Osceola County, FL, operated by KISSIMMEE UTILITY AUTHORITY, commissioned in 1994. Osceola County carries elevated modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.1 of 5 at the 52nd national percentile. Strong wind is the leading peril, rated Very High by FEMA at the 99th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.1 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
ElevatedExposure band
Strong windLeading peril
Relatively ModerateFEMA county risk rating

Osceola County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Strong windVery High99th5.0 of 50.94
HurricaneRelatively High86th4.4 of 50.27
WildfireRelatively Moderate84th4.3 of 50.01
LightningVery High81st4.2 of 588.2
Riverine floodingRelatively Moderate60th3.4 of 50.61
TornadoRelatively High49th3.0 of 51.1
Heat waveRelatively Low15th1.6 of 51.9
EarthquakeVery Low13th1.5 of 5<0.01
HailVery Low6th1.3 of 52.0

Perils not assessed in Osceola County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Winter weatherFEMA rating is "No Rating" for this county
Ice stormFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Osceola County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.