EFFINGHAM COUNTY POWER PROJECT
OperatingNatural Gas power plant
- Capacity
- 597 MW
- Primary fuel
- Natural Gas
- County
- Effingham County
- Operator
- CAMS MACKINAW POWER OPERATIONS LLC
- Status
- Operating
- Commissioned
- 2003
- EIA plant ID
- 55406
- Generators
- 3
- Technology
- Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle
- Net generation (2024)
- 1,650 GWh
- Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
- 31%
- Data vintage
- EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
- Coordinates
- 32.2769, -81.2844
EFFINGHAM COUNTY POWER PROJECT, a 597 MW Natural Gas power plant in Effingham County, Georgia. One of 128 power plants tracked in Georgia on Bywatts.
How EFFINGHAM COUNTY POWER PROJECT compares
With 597 MW of capacity, EFFINGHAM COUNTY POWER PROJECT ranks 20th among the 104 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Georgia and 11th of the 26 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 4.0% of Georgia's operating Natural Gas capacity and 1.7% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 261st-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 2003, it is newer than 85% of the 101 operating Georgia plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, CAMS MACKINAW POWER OPERATIONS LLC, runs 5 operating plants in Georgia totaling 2,964 MW. It shares Effingham County with 3 other operating plants, including MCINTOSH and PLANT MCINTOSH.
EIA-860 lists 3 generators at the site with 597 MW of nameplate capacity, all natural gas fired combined cycle technology. Net generation was 1,650 GWh in 2024 (a 31% capacity factor), down 35% from 2022.
Grid neighborhood
The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 230 kV line owned by GEORGIA TRANSMISSION CORP, under 0.1 miles away. Another 9 operating power plants totaling 3,364 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is JASPER (1,002 MW, Natural Gas).
Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology
Weather peril exposure
EFFINGHAM COUNTY POWER PROJECT is a 597 MW natural gas power plant in Effingham County, GA, operated by CAMS MACKINAW POWER OPERATIONS LLC, commissioned in 2003. Effingham County carries high modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.4 of 5 at the 60th national percentile. Hurricane is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 93rd percentile.
The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.
Effingham County hazard ratings
| Peril | FEMA rating | National percentile | Peril score | Events per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane | Relatively Moderate | 93rd | 4.7 of 5 | 0.29 |
| Earthquake | Relatively Low | 79th | 4.2 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Lightning | Relatively Low | 78th | 4.1 of 5 | 68.0 |
| Wildfire | Relatively Low | 57th | 3.3 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Riverine flooding | Relatively Low | 43rd | 2.7 of 5 | 0.25 |
| Winter weather | Very Low | 43rd | 2.7 of 5 | 0.79 |
| Heat wave | Relatively Low | 42nd | 2.7 of 5 | 8.9 |
| Tornado | Relatively Low | 42nd | 2.7 of 5 | 0.21 |
| Ice storm | Relatively Low | 35th | 2.4 of 5 | 0.58 |
| Coastal flooding | Very Low | 28th | 2.1 of 5 | 0.20 |
| Hail | Relatively Low | 24th | 1.9 of 5 | 2.3 |
| Strong wind | Relatively Low | 10th | 1.4 of 5 | 1.8 |
Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Effingham County in the weather risk calculator
Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.
Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.