PROVIDENCE HEIGHTS WIND LLC

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
72 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Bureau County
Operator
IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2008
EIA plant ID
56622
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
141 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
22%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
41.2294, -89.5572

See it on the map

PROVIDENCE HEIGHTS WIND LLC, a 72 MW Wind power plant in Bureau County, Illinois. Operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned 2008.

How PROVIDENCE HEIGHTS WIND LLC compares

With 72 MW of capacity, PROVIDENCE HEIGHTS WIND LLC ranks 66th among the 158 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Illinois and 21st of the 27 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 2.0% of Illinois's operating Wind capacity and 0.2% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 329th-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2008, it is newer than 80% of the 150 operating Illinois plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, runs 2 operating plants in Illinois totaling 372 MW. It shares Bureau County with 4 other operating plants, including BIG SKY WIND LLC and CRESCENT RIDGE.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 72 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 141 GWh in 2024 (a 22% capacity factor), down 18% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 138 kV line, about 1.8 miles away. Another 5 operating power plants totaling 286 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is CAMP GROVE WIND FARM (150 MW, Wind).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

PROVIDENCE HEIGHTS WIND LLC is a 72 MW wind power plant in Bureau County, IL, operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned in 2008. Bureau County carries high modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.6 of 5 at the 64th national percentile. Tornado is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 78th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.6 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
HighExposure band
TornadoLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Bureau County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
TornadoRelatively Moderate78th4.1 of 50.84
Strong windRelatively Moderate74th4.0 of 55.9
HailRelatively Moderate70th3.8 of 53.9
EarthquakeRelatively Low65th3.6 of 5<0.01
Ice stormRelatively Moderate47th2.9 of 50.63
LightningRelatively Low31st2.2 of 543.1
Heat waveRelatively Low26th2.1 of 56.5
Winter weatherRelatively Low23rd1.9 of 514.8
Riverine floodingRelatively Low18th1.7 of 50.86
HurricaneVery Low8th1.3 of 5<0.01
WildfireVery Low7th1.3 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Bureau County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Bureau County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.