CRANE CREEK WIND ENERGY CENTER

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
99 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Howard County
Operator
WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORP
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2009
EIA plant ID
56831
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
302 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
35%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
43.4375, -92.5435

See it on the map

CRANE CREEK WIND ENERGY CENTER, a 99 MW Wind power plant in Howard County, Iowa. Operated by WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORP, commissioned 2009.

How CRANE CREEK WIND ENERGY CENTER compares

With 99 MW of capacity, CRANE CREEK WIND ENERGY CENTER ranks 45th among the 198 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Iowa and 24th of the 63 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 1.9% of Iowa's operating Wind capacity and 0.6% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 261st-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2009, it is newer than 76% of the 198 operating Iowa plants with a recorded commissioning year. It shares Howard County with one other operating plant, ALLIANT SBD 9206 DONALDSON.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 99 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 302 GWh in 2024 (a 35% capacity factor), up 11% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 345 kV line owned by MIDAMERICAN ENERGY CO, about 1.1 miles away. Another 9 operating power plants totaling 652 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is PIONEER PRAIRIE WIND FARM (300 MW, Wind). Within 50 miles is one mapped data center, NP Rochester in Rochester, about 40.5 miles away.

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records, EIA-860/923 survey data and PeeringDB data center locations; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

CRANE CREEK WIND ENERGY CENTER is a 99 MW wind power plant in Howard County, IA, operated by WISCONSIN PUBLIC SERVICE CORP, commissioned in 2009. Howard County carries high modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.5 of 5 at the 64th national percentile. Heat wave is the leading peril, rated Very Low by FEMA at the 90th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.5 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
HighExposure band
Heat waveLeading peril
Very LowFEMA county risk rating

Howard County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Heat waveVery Low90th4.6 of 53.8
TornadoRelatively Low80th4.2 of 50.34
Strong windRelatively Low78th4.1 of 53.8
LightningVery Low71st3.8 of 538.3
HailRelatively Low69th3.8 of 54.6
Winter weatherRelatively Low61st3.4 of 518.7
Riverine floodingVery Low56th3.2 of 51.0
Ice stormVery Low35th2.4 of 50.74
WildfireVery Low15th1.6 of 5<0.01
EarthquakeVery Low8th1.3 of 5<0.01
HurricaneVery Low5th1.2 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Howard County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Howard County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.