TRIMONT AREA WIND FARM

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
101 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Martin County
Operator
IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2005
EIA plant ID
56296
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
379 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
43%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
43.8086, -94.8190

See it on the map

TRIMONT AREA WIND FARM, a 101 MW Wind power plant in Martin County, Minnesota. Operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned 2005.

How TRIMONT AREA WIND FARM compares

With 101 MW of capacity, TRIMONT AREA WIND FARM ranks 30th among the 215 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Minnesota and 10th of the 78 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 3.8% of Minnesota's operating Wind capacity and 0.6% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 244th-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2005, it is newer than 71% of the 200 operating Minnesota plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, runs 5 operating plants in Minnesota totaling 449 MW. It shares Martin County with 7 other operating plants, including LAKEFIELD JUNCTION and ELM CREEK WIND II.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 101 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 379 GWh in 2024 (a 43% capacity factor), down 9% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 345 kV line, about 0.4 miles away. Another 15 operating power plants totaling 1,093 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is LAKEFIELD JUNCTION (538 MW, Natural Gas).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

TRIMONT AREA WIND FARM is a 101 MW wind power plant in Martin County, MN, operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned in 2005. Martin County carries elevated modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.0 of 5 at the 50th national percentile. Winter weather is the leading peril, rated Relatively High by FEMA at the 96th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.0 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
ElevatedExposure band
Winter weatherLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Martin County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Winter weatherRelatively High96th4.8 of 521.7
Heat waveRelatively Low93rd4.7 of 54.8
Strong windRelatively Moderate90th4.6 of 53.5
TornadoRelatively Moderate88th4.5 of 50.57
Ice stormRelatively Low55th3.2 of 50.57
HailRelatively Moderate55th3.2 of 54.4
LightningVery Low37th2.5 of 538.7
WildfireVery Low20th1.8 of 5<0.01
Riverine floodingRelatively Low19th1.8 of 50.61
EarthquakeVery Low7th1.3 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Martin County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Martin County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.