SYLVARENA

Operating

Natural Gas power plant

Capacity
141 MW
Primary fuel
Natural Gas
County
Smith County
Operator
SOUTH MISSISSIPPI EL PWR ASSN
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2003
EIA plant ID
7989
Generators
3
Technology
Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine
Net generation (2024)
294 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
24%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
31.9820, -89.4127

See it on the map

SYLVARENA, a 141 MW Natural Gas power plant in Smith County, Mississippi. Operated by SOUTH MISSISSIPPI EL PWR ASSN, commissioned 2003.

How SYLVARENA compares

With 141 MW of capacity, SYLVARENA ranks 20th among the 37 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Mississippi and 15th of the 21 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 1.5% of Mississippi's operating Natural Gas capacity and 0.9% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 616th-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 2003, it is newer than 68% of the 35 operating Mississippi plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, SOUTH MISSISSIPPI EL PWR ASSN, runs 6 operating plants in Mississippi totaling 2,209 MW. It shares Smith County with one other operating plant, RALEIGH CO2 PLANT.

EIA-860 lists 3 generators at the site with 141 MW of nameplate capacity, all natural gas fired combustion turbine technology. Net generation was 294 GWh in 2024 (a 24% capacity factor), up 25% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 115 kV line owned by MISSISSIPPI POWER CO, under 0.1 miles away. One other operating power plant sits within 25 miles: RALEIGH CO2 PLANT (5 MW).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

SYLVARENA is a 141 MW natural gas power plant in Smith County, MS, operated by SOUTH MISSISSIPPI EL PWR ASSN, commissioned in 2003. Smith County carries critical modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 4.6 of 5 at the 90th national percentile. Lightning is the leading peril, rated Relatively Low by FEMA at the 99th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

4.6 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
CriticalExposure band
LightningLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Smith County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
LightningRelatively Low99th5.0 of 573.8
TornadoRelatively Moderate96th4.8 of 50.96
HailRelatively Moderate90th4.6 of 54.8
HurricaneRelatively Moderate85th4.4 of 50.13
Strong windRelatively Moderate79th4.2 of 53.9
Ice stormRelatively Low66th3.6 of 51.0
EarthquakeVery Low52nd3.1 of 5<0.01
WildfireVery Low50th3.0 of 5<0.01
Heat waveRelatively Low48th2.9 of 511.6
Winter weatherRelatively Low39th2.6 of 52.2
Riverine floodingRelatively Low36th2.5 of 51.1

Perils not assessed in Smith County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Smith County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.