HIGH LONESOME MESA LLC

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
100 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Torrance County
Operator
EDISON MISSION ENERGY
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2009
EIA plant ID
56945
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
352 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
40%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
34.4667, -105.9625

See it on the map

HIGH LONESOME MESA LLC, a 100 MW Wind power plant in Torrance County, New Mexico. Operated by EDISON MISSION ENERGY, commissioned 2009.

How HIGH LONESOME MESA LLC compares

With 100 MW of capacity, HIGH LONESOME MESA LLC ranks 17th among the 65 operating power plants Bywatts maps in New Mexico and 5th of the 12 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 9.3% of New Mexico's operating Wind capacity and 1.4% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 253rd-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2009, it is older than 57% of the 63 operating New Mexico plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, EDISON MISSION ENERGY, runs 2 operating plants in New Mexico totaling 220 MW. It shares Torrance County with one other operating plant, EL CABO WIND.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 100 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 352 GWh in 2024 (a 40% capacity factor), up 11% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The nearest named substation is WILLARD (115 kV), about 12.1 miles away; the closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 115 kV line owned by CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, about 0.5 miles away.

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant, substation and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

HIGH LONESOME MESA LLC is a 100 MW wind power plant in Torrance County, NM, operated by EDISON MISSION ENERGY, commissioned in 2009. Torrance County carries moderate modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 2.4 of 5 at the 34th national percentile. Riverine flooding is the leading peril, rated Relatively Low by FEMA at the 91st percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

2.4 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
ModerateExposure band
Riverine floodingLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Torrance County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Riverine floodingRelatively Low91st4.6 of 50.71
WildfireRelatively Moderate87th4.5 of 5<0.01
EarthquakeRelatively Low76th4.1 of 5<0.01
Winter weatherRelatively Moderate63rd3.5 of 512.9
Ice stormRelatively Low57th3.3 of 50.21
HailRelatively Low46th2.9 of 50.79
Strong windVery Low19th1.8 of 50.27
Heat waveVery Low15th1.6 of 50.19
TornadoVery Low14th1.6 of 50.29
LightningRelatively Low5th1.2 of 560.0

Perils not assessed in Torrance County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Torrance County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.