COYOTE
OperatingCoal power plant
- Capacity
- 450 MW
- Primary fuel
- Coal
- County
- Mercer County
- Operator
- OTTER TAIL POWER CO
- Status
- Operating
- Commissioned
- 1981
- EIA plant ID
- 8222
- Generators
- 1
- Technology
- Conventional Steam Coal
- Net generation (2024)
- 2,208 GWh
- Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
- 56%
- Data vintage
- EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
- Coordinates
- 47.2216, -101.8156
COYOTE, a 450 MW Coal power plant in Mercer County, North Dakota. Operated by OTTER TAIL POWER CO, commissioned 1981.
How COYOTE compares
With 450 MW of capacity, COYOTE ranks 6th among the 40 operating power plants Bywatts maps in North Dakota and 5th of the 8 operating Coal plants in the state. It accounts for about 11% of North Dakota's operating Coal capacity and 7.0% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 168th-largest of the 324 operating Coal plants in the database. Commissioned in 1981, it is older than 80% of the 40 operating North Dakota plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, OTTER TAIL POWER CO, runs 5 operating plants in North Dakota totaling 598 MW. It shares Mercer County with 3 other operating plants, including ANTELOPE VALLEY and LELAND OLDS.
EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 450 MW of nameplate capacity, all conventional steam coal technology. Net generation was 2,208 GWh in 2024 (a 56% capacity factor), down 3% from 2022.
Grid neighborhood
The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 345 kV line, under 0.1 miles away. Another 5 operating power plants totaling 1,815 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is ANTELOPE VALLEY (870 MW, Coal).
Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology
Weather peril exposure
COYOTE is a 450 MW coal power plant in Mercer County, ND, operated by OTTER TAIL POWER CO, commissioned in 1981. Mercer County carries critical modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 4.8 of 5 at the 95th national percentile. Winter weather is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 98th percentile.
The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a coal plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.
Mercer County hazard ratings
| Peril | FEMA rating | National percentile | Peril score | Events per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winter weather | Relatively Moderate | 98th | 4.9 of 5 | 18.4 |
| Hail | Relatively Moderate | 96th | 4.8 of 5 | 2.5 |
| Heat wave | Very Low | 90th | 4.6 of 5 | 1.6 |
| Ice storm | Relatively Moderate | 87th | 4.5 of 5 | 0.64 |
| Wildfire | Very Low | 66th | 3.6 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Strong wind | Relatively Low | 64th | 3.6 of 5 | 1.5 |
| Tornado | Relatively Low | 48th | 2.9 of 5 | 0.32 |
| Riverine flooding | Very Low | 40th | 2.6 of 5 | 0.43 |
| Lightning | Very Low | 36th | 2.5 of 5 | 29.7 |
| Earthquake | Very Low | 6th | 1.3 of 5 | <0.01 |
Perils not assessed in Mercer County
These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.
| Peril | Why it is not scored |
|---|---|
| Hurricane | FEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county |
| Coastal flooding | FEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county |
Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Mercer County in the weather risk calculator
Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.
Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.