CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT
OperatingWind power plant
- Capacity
- 235 MW
- Primary fuel
- Wind
- County
- Garfield County
- Operator
- CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT
- Status
- Operating
- Commissioned
- 2012
- EIA plant ID
- 58041
- Generators
- 2
- Technology
- Onshore Wind Turbine
- Net generation (2024)
- 978 GWh
- Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
- 37%
- Data vintage
- EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
- Coordinates
- 36.5746, -97.6740
CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT, a 235 MW Wind power plant in Garfield County, Oklahoma. Operated by CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT, commissioned 2012.
How CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT compares
With 235 MW of capacity, CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT ranks 25th among the 73 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Oklahoma and 2nd of the 23 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 7.8% of Oklahoma's operating Wind capacity and 0.9% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 30th-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2012, it is newer than 87% of the 72 operating Oklahoma plants with a recorded commissioning year.
EIA-860 lists 2 generators at the site with 300 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology (this page's HIFLD capacity figure is 235 MW). Net generation was 978 GWh in 2024 (a 37% capacity factor), down 10% from 2022. Its generators came online between 2012 and 2016.
Grid neighborhood
The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 345 kV line owned by OKLAHOMA GAS & ELECTRIC CO, under 0.1 miles away. One other operating power plant sits within 25 miles: NEXTERA-BLACKWELL WIND, LLC (60 MW, Wind).
Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology
Weather peril exposure
CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT is a 235 MW wind power plant in Garfield County, OK, operated by CHISHOLM VIEW WIND PROJECT, commissioned in 2012. Garfield County carries critical modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 4.6 of 5 at the 90th national percentile. Ice storm is the leading peril, rated Very High by FEMA at the 95th percentile.
The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.
Garfield County hazard ratings
| Peril | FEMA rating | National percentile | Peril score | Events per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ice storm | Very High | 95th | 4.8 of 5 | 0.91 |
| Tornado | Relatively High | 94th | 4.8 of 5 | 1.0 |
| Hail | Relatively Moderate | 92nd | 4.7 of 5 | 9.1 |
| Lightning | Relatively Low | 82nd | 4.3 of 5 | 50.8 |
| Heat wave | Relatively Moderate | 68th | 3.7 of 5 | 17.5 |
| Winter weather | Relatively Moderate | 59th | 3.4 of 5 | 9.3 |
| Strong wind | Relatively Moderate | 53rd | 3.1 of 5 | 5.4 |
| Riverine flooding | Relatively Low | 51st | 3.1 of 5 | 1.0 |
| Earthquake | Very Low | 46th | 2.8 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Wildfire | Very Low | 38th | 2.5 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Hurricane | Very Low | 16th | 1.6 of 5 | <0.01 |
Perils not assessed in Garfield County
These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.
| Peril | Why it is not scored |
|---|---|
| Coastal flooding | FEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county |
Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Garfield County in the weather risk calculator
Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.
Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.