BUCHANAN

Operating

Hydro power plant

Capacity
55 MW
Primary fuel
Hydro
County
Llano County
Operator
LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY
Status
Operating
Commissioned
1938
EIA plant ID
3595
Generators
3
Technology
Conventional Hydroelectric
Net generation (2024)
17.1 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
3.6%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
30.7513, -98.4179

See it on the map

BUCHANAN, a 55 MW Hydro power plant in Llano County, Texas. Operated by LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY, commissioned 1938.

How BUCHANAN compares

With 55 MW of capacity, BUCHANAN ranks 215th among the 307 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Texas and 6th of the 22 operating Hydro plants in the state. It accounts for about 8.2% of Texas's operating Hydro capacity and under 0.1% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 267th-largest of the 1,243 operating Hydro plants in the database. Commissioned in 1938, it is older than 97% of the 303 operating Texas plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY, runs 11 operating plants in Texas totaling 3,912 MW. It shares Llano County with one other operating plant, THOMAS C FERGUSON.

EIA-860 lists 3 generators at the site with 55 MW of nameplate capacity, all conventional hydroelectric technology. Net generation was 17.1 GWh in 2024 (a 3.6% capacity factor). Its generators came online between 1938 and 1950.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 138 kV line owned by PEDERNALES ELECTRIC COOP, INC, under 0.1 miles away. Another 4 operating power plants totaling 565 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is THOMAS C FERGUSON (446 MW, Natural Gas).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

BUCHANAN is a 55 MW hydro power plant in Llano County, TX, operated by LOWER COLORADO RIVER AUTHORITY, commissioned in 1938. Llano County carries high modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 4.0 of 5 at the 76th national percentile. Riverine flooding is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 92nd percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a hydro plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

4.0 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
HighExposure band
Riverine floodingLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Llano County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Riverine floodingRelatively Moderate92nd4.7 of 52.4
HailRelatively Moderate81st4.2 of 53.8
WildfireRelatively Low65th3.6 of 5<0.01
Winter weatherRelatively Moderate61st3.5 of 54.1
Strong windRelatively Low58th3.3 of 51.1
HurricaneVery Low53rd3.1 of 50.01
TornadoRelatively Moderate49th3.0 of 50.34
Heat waveRelatively Low35th2.4 of 56.7
Ice stormVery Low11th1.4 of 50.46
LightningRelatively Moderate7th1.3 of 547.9
EarthquakeVery Low4th1.2 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Llano County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Llano County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.