MARTIN LAKE

Operating

Coal power plant

Capacity
2,380 MW
Primary fuel
Coal
County
Rusk County
Operator
LUMINANT GENERATION COMPANY LLC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
1977
EIA plant ID
6146
Generators
3
Technology
Conventional Steam Coal
Net generation (2024)
9,741 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
47%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
32.2592, -94.5715

See it on the map

MARTIN LAKE, a 2,380 MW Coal power plant in Rusk County, Texas. Operated by LUMINANT GENERATION COMPANY LLC, commissioned 1977.

How MARTIN LAKE compares

With 2,380 MW of capacity, MARTIN LAKE ranks 4th among the 307 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Texas and 2nd of the 12 operating Coal plants in the state. It accounts for about 13% of Texas's operating Coal capacity and 2.3% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 21st-largest of the 324 operating Coal plants in the database. Commissioned in 1977, it is older than 79% of the 303 operating Texas plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, LUMINANT GENERATION COMPANY LLC, runs 9 operating plants in Texas totaling 9,469 MW. It shares Rusk County with one other operating plant, TENASKA GATEWAY GENERATING STATION.

EIA-860 lists 3 generators at the site with 2,380 MW of nameplate capacity, all conventional steam coal technology. Net generation was 9,741 GWh in 2024 (a 47% capacity factor), down 23% from 2022. Its generators came online between 1977 and 1979.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 138 kV line, about 0.2 miles away. Another 5 operating power plants totaling 2,483 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is TENASKA GATEWAY GENERATING STATION (940 MW, Natural Gas).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

MARTIN LAKE is a 2,380 MW coal power plant in Rusk County, TX, operated by LUMINANT GENERATION COMPANY LLC, commissioned in 1977. Rusk County carries moderate modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 2.6 of 5 at the 39th national percentile. Strong wind is the leading peril, rated Relatively High by FEMA at the 90th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a coal plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

2.6 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
ModerateExposure band
Strong windLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Rusk County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Strong windRelatively High90th4.6 of 55.5
TornadoRelatively Moderate82nd4.3 of 50.77
Winter weatherRelatively Moderate75th4.0 of 52.9
Ice stormRelatively Moderate74th3.9 of 50.87
LightningRelatively Moderate71st3.8 of 562.1
Heat waveRelatively Moderate70th3.8 of 519.6
HurricaneRelatively Low66th3.7 of 50.06
WildfireRelatively Low60th3.4 of 5<0.01
HailRelatively Low42nd2.7 of 54.8
EarthquakeVery Low33rd2.3 of 5<0.01
Riverine floodingRelatively Low12th1.5 of 51.2

Perils not assessed in Rusk County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Rusk County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.