SAND BLUFF WIND FARM

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
90 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Glasscock County
Operator
E ON CLIMATE RENEWABLES N AMERICA LLC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2007
EIA plant ID
56479
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
318 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
40%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
31.9916, -101.3027

See it on the map

SAND BLUFF WIND FARM, a 90 MW Wind power plant in Glasscock County, Texas. Operated by E ON CLIMATE RENEWABLES N AMERICA LLC, commissioned 2007.

How SAND BLUFF WIND FARM compares

With 90 MW of capacity, SAND BLUFF WIND FARM ranks 188th among the 307 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Texas and 58th of the 94 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 0.8% of Texas's operating Wind capacity and under 0.1% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 287th-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2007, it is newer than 64% of the 303 operating Texas plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, E ON CLIMATE RENEWABLES N AMERICA LLC, runs 13 operating plants in Texas totaling 2,136 MW. It shares Glasscock County with 2 other operating plants, FOREST CREEK WIND FARM LLC and EC&R PANTHER CREEK WIND FARM II.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 90 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 318 GWh in 2024 (a 40% capacity factor).

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 138 kV line owned by ONCOR ELECTRIC DELIVERY CO., about 1.2 miles away. Another 8 operating power plants totaling 1,547 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is CAPRICORN RIDGE WIND LLC (663 MW, Wind).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

SAND BLUFF WIND FARM is a 90 MW wind power plant in Glasscock County, TX, operated by E ON CLIMATE RENEWABLES N AMERICA LLC, commissioned in 2007. Glasscock County carries critical modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 4.5 of 5 at the 88th national percentile. Lightning is the leading peril, rated Very Low by FEMA at the 97th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

4.5 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
CriticalExposure band
LightningLeading peril
Very LowFEMA county risk rating

Glasscock County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
LightningVery Low97th4.9 of 546.4
Strong windVery Low91st4.6 of 51.8
HailRelatively Low90th4.6 of 54.3
WildfireVery Low84th4.4 of 5<0.01
Heat waveVery Low60th3.4 of 55.4
Winter weatherVery Low48th2.9 of 55.3
TornadoVery Low44th2.7 of 50.43
HurricaneVery Low34th2.4 of 5<0.01
Riverine floodingVery Low12th1.5 of 50.75
EarthquakeVery Low11th1.4 of 5<0.01
Ice stormVery Low5th1.2 of 50.07

Perils not assessed in Glasscock County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Glasscock County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.