WALLINGFORD ENERGY
OperatingNatural Gas power plant
- Capacity
- 250 MW
- Primary fuel
- Natural Gas
- County
- South Central Connecticut Planning Region
- Operator
- WALLINGFORD ENERGY LLC
- Status
- Operating
- Commissioned
- 2001
- EIA plant ID
- 55517
- Generators
- 7
- Technology
- Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine
- Net generation (2024)
- 87.8 GWh
- Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
- 2.9%
- Data vintage
- EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
- Coordinates
- 41.4486, -72.8352
WALLINGFORD ENERGY, a 250 MW Natural Gas power plant in South Central Connecticut Planning Region, Connecticut.
How WALLINGFORD ENERGY compares
With 250 MW of capacity, WALLINGFORD ENERGY ranks 10th among the 68 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Connecticut and 5th of the 13 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 7.6% of Connecticut's operating Natural Gas capacity and 2.7% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 501st-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 2001, it is newer than 50% of the 66 operating Connecticut plants with a recorded commissioning year. It shares South Central Connecticut Planning Region with 7 other operating plants, including NEW HAVEN HARBOR and MILFORD POWER PROJECT.
EIA-860 lists 7 generators at the site with 350 MW of nameplate capacity, all natural gas fired combustion turbine technology (this page's HIFLD capacity figure is 250 MW). Net generation was 87.8 GWh in 2024 (a 2.9% capacity factor). Its generators came online between 2001 and 2018.
Grid neighborhood
The nearest named substation is NORTH HAVEN, about 2.4 miles away; the closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 115 kV line, under 0.1 miles away. Another 21 operating power plants totaling 3,750 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is MIDDLETOWN (786 MW, Natural Gas).
Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant, substation and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology
Weather peril exposure
WALLINGFORD ENERGY is a 250 MW natural gas power plant in South Central Connecticut Planning Region, CT, operated by WALLINGFORD ENERGY LLC, commissioned in 2001. South Central Connecticut Planning Region carries moderate modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 2.3 of 5 at the 32nd national percentile. Hurricane is the leading peril, rated Relatively High by FEMA at the 86th percentile.
The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.
South Central Connecticut Planning Region hazard ratings
| Peril | FEMA rating | National percentile | Peril score | Events per year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hurricane | Relatively High | 86th | 4.5 of 5 | 0.17 |
| Coastal flooding | Relatively High | 82nd | 4.3 of 5 | 5.0 |
| Ice storm | Very High | 70th | 3.8 of 5 | 2.0 |
| Earthquake | Relatively Moderate | 64th | 3.5 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Riverine flooding | Relatively High | 60th | 3.4 of 5 | 3.3 |
| Wildfire | Very Low | 28th | 2.1 of 5 | <0.01 |
| Winter weather | Relatively High | 26th | 2.0 of 5 | 12.8 |
| Tornado | Relatively Moderate | 22nd | 1.9 of 5 | 0.17 |
| Strong wind | Relatively High | 17th | 1.7 of 5 | 3.4 |
| Lightning | Relatively High | 7th | 1.3 of 5 | 26.1 |
| Heat wave | Relatively Moderate | 7th | 1.3 of 5 | 5.0 |
| Hail | Relatively Low | 5th | 1.2 of 5 | 2.3 |
Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.
Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.