CABINET GORGE

Operating

Hydro power plant

Capacity
265 MW
Primary fuel
Hydro
County
Bonner County
Operator
AVISTA CORP
Status
Operating
Commissioned
1952
EIA plant ID
833
Generators
4
Technology
Conventional Hydroelectric
Net generation (2024)
858 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
37%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
48.0866, -116.0582

See it on the map

CABINET GORGE, a 265 MW Hydro power plant in Bonner County, Idaho. Operated by AVISTA CORP, commissioned 1952.

How CABINET GORGE compares

With 265 MW of capacity, CABINET GORGE ranks 6th among the 123 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Idaho and 3rd of the 70 operating Hydro plants in the state. It accounts for about 11% of Idaho's operating Hydro capacity and 5.4% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 71st-largest of the 1,243 operating Hydro plants in the database. Commissioned in 1952, it is older than 78% of the 121 operating Idaho plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, AVISTA CORP, runs 3 operating plants in Idaho totaling 446 MW. It shares Bonner County with one other operating plant, ALBENI FALLS.

EIA-860 lists 4 generators at the site with 265 MW of nameplate capacity, all conventional hydroelectric technology. Net generation was 858 GWh in 2024 (a 37% capacity factor), down 22% from 2022. Its generators came online between 1952 and 1953.

Grid neighborhood

The nearest named substation is CABINET GORGE (230 kV), about 0.1 miles away; the closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 230 kV line owned by AVISTA CORP, under 0.1 miles away. One other operating power plant sits within 25 miles: NOXON RAPIDS (532 MW, Hydro).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant, substation and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

CABINET GORGE is a 265 MW hydro power plant in Bonner County, ID, operated by AVISTA CORP, commissioned in 1952. Bonner County carries low modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 1.2 of 5 at the 5th national percentile. Riverine flooding is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 97th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a hydro plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

1.2 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
LowExposure band
Riverine floodingLeading peril
Relatively LowFEMA county risk rating

Bonner County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Riverine floodingRelatively Moderate97th4.9 of 50.61
WildfireRelatively Low73rd3.9 of 5<0.01
Ice stormRelatively Moderate55th3.2 of 50.11
Heat waveRelatively Low53rd3.1 of 52.8
Winter weatherRelatively High52nd3.1 of 527.1
EarthquakeVery Low48th2.9 of 5<0.01
Strong windRelatively Low14th1.5 of 50.20
HailVery Low7th1.3 of 50.22
TornadoVery Low3rd1.1 of 50.04
LightningRelatively Low2nd1.1 of 519.8

Perils not assessed in Bonner County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Bonner County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.