GOOSE CREEK ENERGY CENTER

Operating

Natural Gas power plant

Capacity
684 MW
Primary fuel
Natural Gas
County
Piatt County
Operator
UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO)
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2003
EIA plant ID
55496
Generators
6
Technology
Natural Gas Fired Combustion Turbine
Net generation (2024)
0.763 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
under 0.1%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
40.1071, -88.5994

See it on the map

GOOSE CREEK ENERGY CENTER, a 684 MW Natural Gas power plant in Piatt County, Illinois. Operated by UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO), commissioned 2003.

How GOOSE CREEK ENERGY CENTER compares

With 684 MW of capacity, GOOSE CREEK ENERGY CENTER ranks 18th among the 158 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Illinois and 7th of the 50 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 4.6% of Illinois's operating Natural Gas capacity and 1.7% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 206th-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 2003, it is newer than 72% of the 150 operating Illinois plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO), runs 5 operating plants in Illinois totaling 2,376 MW.

EIA-860 lists 6 generators at the site with 684 MW of nameplate capacity, all natural gas fired combustion turbine technology. Net generation was 0.763 GWh in 2024 (a capacity factor under 0.1%).

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 345 kV line owned by AMEREN ILLINOIS COMPANY, under 0.1 miles away. Another 4 operating power plants totaling 1,570 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is CLINTON POWER STATION (1,138 MW, Nuclear).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

GOOSE CREEK ENERGY CENTER is a 684 MW natural gas power plant in Piatt County, IL, operated by UNION ELECTRIC CO - (MO), commissioned in 2003. Piatt County carries high modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.5 of 5 at the 62nd national percentile. Riverine flooding is the leading peril, rated Relatively Low by FEMA at the 85th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.5 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
HighExposure band
Riverine floodingLeading peril
Very LowFEMA county risk rating

Piatt County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Riverine floodingRelatively Low85th4.4 of 50.71
Strong windRelatively Moderate84th4.4 of 55.0
EarthquakeRelatively Low83rd4.3 of 5<0.01
TornadoRelatively Low74th4.0 of 50.49
HailRelatively Low67th3.7 of 53.1
Winter weatherRelatively Low52nd3.1 of 59.3
Ice stormRelatively Low47th2.9 of 51.4
Heat waveRelatively Low20th1.8 of 56.6
LightningVery Low17th1.7 of 547.7
HurricaneVery Low14th1.6 of 50.01
WildfireVery Low7th1.3 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Piatt County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Piatt County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.