MORAINE WIND

Operating

Wind power plant

Capacity
51 MW
Primary fuel
Wind
County
Pipestone County
Operator
IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2003
EIA plant ID
56174
Generators
1
Technology
Onshore Wind Turbine
Net generation (2024)
61 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
14%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
44.0823, -96.0890

See it on the map

MORAINE WIND, a 51 MW Wind power plant in Pipestone County, Minnesota. Operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned 2003.

How MORAINE WIND compares

With 51 MW of capacity, MORAINE WIND ranks 43rd among the 215 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Minnesota and 15th of the 78 operating Wind plants in the state. It accounts for about 1.9% of Minnesota's operating Wind capacity and 0.3% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 372nd-largest of the 708 operating Wind plants in the database. Commissioned in 2003, it is newer than 61% of the 200 operating Minnesota plants with a recorded commissioning year. Its operator, IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, runs 5 operating plants in Minnesota totaling 449 MW. It shares Pipestone County with 13 other operating plants, including LAKE BENTON II and MORAINE II WIND.

EIA-860 lists 1 generator at the site with 51 MW of nameplate capacity, all onshore wind turbine technology. Net generation was 61 GWh in 2024 (a 14% capacity factor), down 41% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 115 kV line owned by NORTHERN STATES POWER CO - MINNESOTA, about 2.2 miles away. Another 32 operating power plants totaling 1,012 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is BUFFALO RIDGE II LLC (210 MW, Wind).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

MORAINE WIND is a 51 MW wind power plant in Pipestone County, MN, operated by IBERDROLA RENEWABLES INC, commissioned in 2003. Pipestone County carries elevated modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 3.1 of 5 at the 52nd national percentile. Winter weather is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 97th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a wind plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

3.1 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
ElevatedExposure band
Winter weatherLeading peril
Very LowFEMA county risk rating

Pipestone County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
Winter weatherRelatively Moderate97th4.9 of 520.7
Heat waveRelatively Low89th4.6 of 53.4
TornadoRelatively Low85th4.4 of 50.36
Strong windRelatively Low82nd4.3 of 53.7
Ice stormRelatively Low78th4.1 of 50.95
HailRelatively Low57th3.3 of 55.3
WildfireVery Low35th2.4 of 5<0.01
Riverine floodingVery Low31st2.2 of 52.0
LightningVery Low27th2.1 of 537.2
EarthquakeVery Low14th1.5 of 5<0.01

Perils not assessed in Pipestone County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Pipestone County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.