COYOTE SPRINGS II

Operating

Natural Gas power plant

Capacity
287 MW
Primary fuel
Natural Gas
County
Morrow County
Operator
AVISTA CORP
Status
Operating
Commissioned
2003
EIA plant ID
7931
Generators
2
Technology
Natural Gas Fired Combined Cycle
Net generation (2024)
2,326 GWh
Capacity factor (2024, EIA nameplate)
92%
Data vintage
EIA-860 2024 final; EIA-923 2022-2024 final
Coordinates
45.8480, -119.6744

See it on the map

COYOTE SPRINGS II, a 287 MW Natural Gas power plant in Morrow County, Oregon. Operated by AVISTA CORP, commissioned 2003.

How COYOTE SPRINGS II compares

With 287 MW of capacity, COYOTE SPRINGS II ranks 14th among the 130 operating power plants Bywatts maps in Oregon and 6th of the 10 operating Natural Gas plants in the state. It accounts for about 7.9% of Oregon's operating Natural Gas capacity and 1.9% of all operating capacity in the state. Nationally it is the 468th-largest of the 1,185 operating Natural Gas plants in the database. Commissioned in 2003, it is newer than 60% of the 128 operating Oregon plants with a recorded commissioning year. It shares Morrow County with 9 other operating plants, including COYOTE SPRINGS and WILLOW CREEK ENERGY CENTER.

EIA-860 lists 2 generators at the site with 287 MW of nameplate capacity, all natural gas fired combined cycle technology. Net generation was 2,326 GWh in 2024 (a 92% capacity factor), up 26% from 2022.

Grid neighborhood

The nearest named substation is COYOTE SPRINGS (500 kV), about 0.1 miles away; the closest transmission line found within 10 miles is a 500 kV line owned by AVISTA CORP, under 0.1 miles away. Another 21 operating power plants totaling 3,673 MW sit within 25 miles; the largest is MCNARY (991 MW, Hydro).

Computed by Bywatts from HIFLD power plant, substation and transmission line records and EIA-860/923 survey data; distances are straight-line. Sources and methodology

Weather peril exposure

COYOTE SPRINGS II is a 287 MW natural gas power plant in Morrow County, OR, operated by AVISTA CORP, commissioned in 2003. Morrow County carries low modeled catastrophe exposure in the FEMA National Risk Index, scoring 1.8 of 5 at the 19th national percentile. Wildfire is the leading peril, rated Relatively Moderate by FEMA at the 96th percentile.

The Bywatts loss layer is calibrated to solar PV hardware, so it is not applied to a natural gas plant. The ratings below are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings for this location.

1.8 of 5Modeled catastrophe exposure
LowExposure band
WildfireLeading peril
Very LowFEMA county risk rating

Morrow County hazard ratings

PerilFEMA ratingNational percentilePeril scoreEvents per year
WildfireRelatively Moderate96th4.8 of 5<0.01
EarthquakeVery Low76th4.0 of 5<0.01
Riverine floodingRelatively Low75th4.0 of 50.29
Heat waveRelatively Low67th3.7 of 55.1
LightningVery Low52nd3.1 of 510.8
Strong windVery Low43rd2.7 of 50.25
HailRelatively Low25th2.0 of 50.29
Winter weatherRelatively Low9th1.3 of 511.7
TornadoVery Low4th1.2 of 50.05
Ice stormRelatively Moderate0th1.0 of 50.09

Perils not assessed in Morrow County

These perils carry no usable National Risk Index figure for this county, so they are excluded from the scoring rather than scored zero. A zero would claim the peril was assessed and found benign.

PerilWhy it is not scored
HurricaneFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county
Coastal floodingFEMA rating is "Not Applicable" for this county

Model hail, wind and flood exposure for Morrow County in the weather risk calculator

Ratings are the FEMA National Risk Index county hazard ratings; the peril score is a Bywatts transform of the FEMA national percentile. Full data sources and the solar vulnerability methodology are in the weather risk calculator.

Modeled estimate for screening and negotiation. Built from FEMA National Risk Index county hazard data and a solar vulnerability layer documented above. Not a quote, a binder, or actuarial advice, and not a substitute for a carrier's own model. Hazard data: FEMA National Risk Index December 2025, synced 2026-07-24. Resolution is county level, not site level.